UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Powered By Google Custom Search Vintage Radio and TV Service Data

Go Back   UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum > Specific Vintage Equipment > Vintage Audio (record players, hi-fi etc)

Notices

Vintage Audio (record players, hi-fi etc) Amplifiers, speakers, gramophones and other audio equipment.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 30th Nov 2020, 7:52 pm   #1
yestertech
Nonode
 
yestertech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Coulsdon, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 2,130
Default Quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

I have a couple of issues with a Quad 33/405 set up :

1 ) the power amp seems far too sensitive for the 33. I'm barely off the end stop on the volume control for reasonable volume and there's quite noticeable bleed through at minimum volume setting. The channel balance this far down the volume control is pretty bad !
I'd always had in my mind that this could be altered via the pluggable 'R11' but it seems I've been wrong all this time ! ( I have no R11 fitted )

2 ) there is a faint 100Hz hum at zero volume from the 405 with the 33 disconnected.
The main PSU caps appear to show fine on the ESR meter. I've seen mentioned that the on-board electrolytics on each amp (C5/C10 ) can cause this. Is this a fairly high probability ?

Any thoughts gratefully received

Andy
yestertech is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2020, 9:26 pm   #2
Trevor
Octode
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 1,082
Default Re: quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

what are you using as your signal source if CD it will be as you describe
Phono an radio should be ok
Caps will need changing by now
If its a 405 mk 1 even the main capacitors could do with a change
Trev
Trevor is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2020, 9:37 pm   #3
audiomm
Pentode
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ranfurly, New Zealand
Posts: 170
Default Re: quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

You'll need to isolate where the faults lie.
First thing to check is the output from the 33 is correct. Which could mean that it actually starts with the inputs. Are you using an input from say a CD player via one of the Radio sockets which could be overloading the 33? If you have a sig. gen then input 100mv into Radio 1 and measure the max output from the 33 and advise. It should be 500mv.
The specifications for input sensitivity for the various 33 inputs are set out in the Operations Manual and if the 33 is working properly then these will be reflected in your measurements.
Secondly, if the 33 has a clean bill of health, then check the performance specs for the 405 in a similar manner to above. An input of 500mv will produce about 28.5 volts at the output into 8 ohm loads ( 100watts = 28.3volts into 8 ohm loads). With regard to the electrolytics C5/C10 - just change these and but use 105 deg C or higher rated jobs. Also, change R7 and R8 (3K3) for 1 watt or higher rated resistors. The originals are half watt and tend to go O/C which can cause a lot of downstream failures.
Let us know how you get on. Regards Mike.
audiomm is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2020, 9:40 pm   #4
Ted Kendall
Dekatron
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kington, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 3,670
Default Re: quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

R11 simply limits the maximum voltage swing at the output for ESLs. Depending on your source, I wonder whether you have the 33 gains set up correctly - raw CD output is too high for the native Aux sensitivity, and usually needs an attenuator. Pickup and tape inputs are configurable.
Ted Kendall is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2020, 10:05 pm   #5
Petedox
Pentode
 
Petedox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Waterlooville, Hampshire, UK.
Posts: 200
Default Re: Quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

First I would check correct input is being used, and that the disc adapter board is fitted in the correct orientation for the input you are using:

Position M1 = Low Output Magnetic, M2 = High Output Mag, C1 = Ceramic.

The S position is 'Special' and can be used as a CD input - best modded according to Quads technical bulletin #36 1991.
__________________
Pete
BVWS Member
Petedox is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2020, 11:30 pm   #6
yestertech
Nonode
 
yestertech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Coulsdon, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 2,130
Default Re: Quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

Thanks all
A good point is made about the source level. It is possible that the 33 sensitivities are incorrect. However to clarify, I was using the FM3 via the radio input for the tests.
I will measure the input sensitivity on the 405 and output level from the 33 as suggested by audiomm, to clarify.


Andy
yestertech is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2020, 11:26 am   #7
yestertech
Nonode
 
yestertech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Coulsdon, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 2,130
Default Re: quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

Quote:
Originally Posted by audiomm View Post
You'll need to isolate where the faults lie.
First thing to check is the output from the 33 is correct. Which could mean that it actually starts with the inputs. Are you using an input from say a CD player via one of the Radio sockets which could be overloading the 33? If you have a sig. gen then input 100mv into Radio 1 and measure the max output from the 33 and advise. It should be 500mv.
The specifications for input sensitivity for the various 33 inputs are set out in the Operations Manual and if the 33 is working properly then these will be reflected in your measurements.
Secondly, if the 33 has a clean bill of health, then check the performance specs for the 405 in a similar manner to above. An input of 500mv will produce about 28.5 volts at the output into 8 ohm loads ( 100watts = 28.3volts into 8 ohm loads). With regard to the electrolytics C5/C10 - just change these and but use 105 deg C or higher rated jobs. Also, change R7 and R8 (3K3) for 1 watt or higher rated resistors. The originals are half watt and tend to go O/C which can cause a lot of downstream failures.
Let us know how you get on. Regards Mike.
I made the measurements as stated and now I'm frankly puzzled. 500mv fed into the channels of the 405 produces virtually spot on 100W into 8 ohms as measured on my wattmeter.
Equally, 100mv fed into the radio 1 input produces around 520mv at maximum output of the 33.
So both seem as intended.
Using the FM3 connected to the Radio 1 input and the volume on max, the output from the 33 looks about right.
Radio 4, with its lower modulation levels averages around 500mv. The more compressed and processed music stations deliver from 500mv up to 1V.

Yet, when connected as a 33/405 set up, for moderate listening levels, I'm only using the first 90 or so degrees of the volume control and the channel balance this far down the control is all over the place. Its also not possible to reduce the volume to true 'zero'. (There is noticeable breakthrough )
It's as if there needs to be a 6dB ( or more ) pad between 33 and 405 ??
It could just be that the speakers ( a pair of bookshelf Tannoys ) are a might too sensitive.

A.
yestertech is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2020, 12:56 pm   #8
Leon Crampin
Octode
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 1,870
Default Re: Quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

My 33 is exactly the same. Much of the problem is due to the law and mechanical backlash between the wipers of the Plessey volume control pot. This makes balance dependent on rotational direction history.

When I bought it, I just couldn't believe that Quad would release a product like this - so I wrote to them. They acknowledged the problem, saying that Morganite pots don't do this - and sent me one.

Words fail.

Leon.
Leon Crampin is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2020, 1:08 pm   #9
nutteronthebus
Hexode
 
nutteronthebus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Glossop, Derbyshire, UK.
Posts: 487
Default Re: Quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

at least you do not have the transformer hum on the 405 where a new one is needed if you look at the photo the RS part number is on it and I have some angle bracket for £5 if you want it


Dave
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	405tx.jpg
Views:	81
Size:	73.2 KB
ID:	221601  
__________________
Any tool can be used as a hammer but a screwdriver makes the best chisel
nutteronthebus is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2020, 1:24 pm   #10
Leon Crampin
Octode
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 1,870
Default Re: Quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

I've had and still have the 405 transformer hum. This is the second one, after buying a replacement from Quad at an exorbitant price for such a poorly constructed component.

My present fix is to surround the 405 completely with books and put it on a rubber mat. I don't care if it gets a bit hot....

Leon.
Leon Crampin is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2020, 3:23 pm   #11
yestertech
Nonode
 
yestertech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Coulsdon, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 2,130
Default Re: Quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

Having now replace C5/C10 on both boards the 405 is nice and quiet.(all completely o/c)
Clearly, I can do very little about the range on the volume control as level wise everything seems to measure correctly.
Unless I start altering the input sensitivity around the LM301 ( R6 ) and/or upgrading the volume pot. for something a little more 'high-end'.
I don't think I'll be going down that route !

Andy
yestertech is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2020, 7:54 pm   #12
audiomm
Pentode
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ranfurly, New Zealand
Posts: 170
Default Re: Quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

[QUOTE=yestertech;1316304]
Clearly, I can do very little about the range on the volume control as level wise everything seems to measure correctly.
Unless I start altering the input sensitivity around the LM301 ( R6 ) and/or upgrading the volume pot. for something a little more 'high-end'.
I don't think I'll be going down that route !]

Actually, you can do something about the output of the 33. The service manual covers this specifically - see attached extract which shows you have options here. That would solve the issue you have. Mike
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Quad 33 mod.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	73.7 KB
ID:	221627  
audiomm is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2020, 8:22 pm   #13
yestertech
Nonode
 
yestertech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Coulsdon, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 2,130
Default Re: Quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

Well I’ve learnt something there - never knew that !
6db should do nicely.

Many thanks Mike !

Andy
yestertech is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2020, 10:31 pm   #14
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

Quote:
6db should do nicely.
I bet you go for 18!
 
Old 2nd Dec 2020, 12:44 am   #15
audiomm
Pentode
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ranfurly, New Zealand
Posts: 170
Default Re: Quad 405 sensitivity and 'hum'

Quote:
Originally Posted by yestertech View Post
Well I’ve learnt something there - never knew that !
6db should do nicely.

Many thanks Mike !

Andy
You're welcome
And here's a suggestion from left field.........If you dont want to mess about with the 33 internals - i.e. keeping it stock , then how about making up the attenuator in a 4 pin Din to 4 pin DIN lead. Put the 15k line resistors in one plug and do the other resistors in the other plug. I've done that using .25watt metal film resistors when making input attenuators (DIN) so I can't see why it can't be done at the output end.
Mike
audiomm is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:05 pm.


All information and advice on this forum is subject to the WARNING AND DISCLAIMER located at https://www.vintage-radio.net/rules.html.
Failure to heed this warning may result in death or serious injury to yourself and/or others.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2023, Paul Stenning.