|
Vintage Amateur and Military Radio Amateur/military receivers and transmitters, morse, and any other related vintage comms equipment. |
|
Thread Tools |
22nd Oct 2020, 1:45 pm | #41 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,289
|
Re: Hallicrafters SX-43 2nd I.F. won't peak
I measured the frequency of the Xtal in my SX24 as 455.42kHz. In circuit the frequency is 455.32kHz. One problem with the alignment is that the instructions don't say how to set the Xtal phasing control during alignment.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
22nd Oct 2020, 4:40 pm | #42 |
Pentode
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Rockford, Illinois, USA.
Posts: 159
|
Re: Hallicrafters SX-43 2nd I.F. won't peak
In the SX-25 there are a number of PDFs on the set and I found one that alludes to how the phasing (setting?) on a SX-25.
|
22nd Oct 2020, 4:43 pm | #43 |
Pentode
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Rockford, Illinois, USA.
Posts: 159
|
Re: Hallicrafters SX-43 2nd I.F. won't peak
Do you have an easy way to measure the crystals frequency? I have not done this to a degree I am happy with (that I am doing it 100% correct). What is the best way to do this using a scope, freq counter, and a signal generator?
|
22nd Oct 2020, 4:55 pm | #44 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,289
|
Re: Hallicrafters SX-43 2nd I.F. won't peak
Just connect the crystal in series with a scope and signal generator, then tune for peak waveform.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
22nd Oct 2020, 5:35 pm | #45 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,901
|
Re: Hallicrafters SX-43 2nd I.F. won't peak
The crystal phasing control in its neutral position provides cancellation of the case capacitance of the crystal proper. Yje phasing capacitor, the crystal case capacitance along with a push-pull IFT winding create a bridge. The phasing control thereby creates a null of the floor of the crystal filter response.
It's clearer if you have a sweeper working on the thing and you watch the display as you twiddle the phasing capacitor. This makes it sound like there is really only one 'correct' position of the phasing control... well, yes, but. In real world use with congested CW signals, the distortion of the passband that off-tuning the phasing control gives can be rather useful. However, you have to remember that this comes at the price of throttling back he skirt selectivity at the other side and throttling back the ultimate skirt selectivity om both sides. For a bit of scenery... A full lattice crystal filter section has a second crystal in the place of the phasing capacitor of the half-lattice version. It's trying to get stopband attenuation by cancelling the current in the case capacitance of one crystal with that of the other... So now you know you need to get crystals with matched case capacitances. You also plant the series resonance of one on the parallel resonance of the other.... so you need those controlling to suit your target bandwidth. There's a limit to how fat you can plan this way, so you instead get a copy of 'Zverev' and calculate the pole-zero patterns for your ideal filter. Collect poles in pairs so you can order crystals for your crystal pairs for a series of full-lattice sections, and voila! you have a classically designed multi pole lattice filter. A lot of work. AND the ordering of a lot of crystals with requirements on parameters only very specialist (read expensive) quartz firms would touch. So people looked for an alternative, and the idea arose of having a series string of crystals with shunt inductors or capacitors between each pair of rocks. It was found that you could synthesise useful filter designs if you had a bag of identical crystals. But it was also found that away from resonance, it degraded into a capacitive ladder attenuator with the case capacitances doing the damage. You could have either an upper sideband filter or a lower. What if you wanted symmetry, or better stopband attenuation? Actually it's easy, and it's where this digression is going. You could stich an inductor across each crystal, value chosen to resonate with the crystal's case capacitance at the centre frequency.... you now get a good, symmetrical bandpass filter embedded in a broader (LC) bandstop filter. It's very useful. There is a plan-B where you add inverting transformers down the line to add little phasing capacitors to make a null with the case capacitance. Away from the centre frequency the nulling goes sour, so again you wind up with your bandpass surrounded by a much broader bandstop filter. It's also very useful Look on them as a modified crystal ladder filter Look on them as a series of simple crystal filters with phasing capacitors Both views are true And they shed a bit of light on what that phasing control does. So if you buy a more modern fancy crystal filter in a box, or a transceiver with several of the expensive things, what's in the box is a simple derivative of what's in that Hallicrafters/HRO/AR88. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
22nd Oct 2020, 5:51 pm | #46 | |
Pentode
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Rockford, Illinois, USA.
Posts: 159
|
Re: Hallicrafters SX-43 2nd I.F. won't peak
Close-up of what looks like the tuning (phase control) of my SX-25 crystal. I plan to align it today and do not relish breaking how well it appears to be working. I will briefly visit the IF tuning but BFO and selectivity are sharp and responsive.
Quote:
|
|