|
General Vintage Technology Discussions For general discussions about vintage radio and other vintage electronics etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
28th Jan 2021, 11:31 am | #41 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 4,396
|
Re: Standardisation of Mains Voltages
That's fascinating and ingenious- imagine the paperwork now though, a modern H + S rep would turn blue and fall over!
|
28th Jan 2021, 1:19 pm | #42 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brentwood, Essex, UK.
Posts: 5,340
|
Re: Standardisation of Mains Voltages
The book mentions that, if (when!) the benzine, which was in an open container, caught fire, the operative only had to pull down a hinged cover to extinguish the flames! The "flashing" line was on the top floor of one building and there was an open bridge at the same level to an adjacent building for use as a fire escape.
I believe one reason for the practice of double-pole fusing may have been to allow each circuit to be isolated independantly for carrying out insulation tests. The 1893 GEC catalogue includes examples of some typical wiring installations and, while they have single-pole fusing, the fuse is in one leg and the switch in the other. This was stated to facilitate insulation testing of the individual circuits (no doubt using one of the catalogue's "meggers" that could be hired out by the day if you didn't want to buy one). Last edited by emeritus; 28th Jan 2021 at 1:36 pm. Reason: Further comment on fuses |
28th Jan 2021, 2:28 pm | #43 |
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Exeter, Devon and Poole, Dorset UK.
Posts: 6,867
|
Re: Standardisation of Mains Voltages
As this is one of Many threads on this subject and seems to be diverging somewhat it's time to flick the big off switch.
Cheers Mike T
__________________
Invisible airwaves crackle with life or at least they used to Mike T BVWS member. www.cossor.co.uk |