Quote:
Originally Posted by knobtwiddler
I seem to remember NAD as being a serial offender in terms of gilding the lily with regards to output. They claimed momentary peak outputs vastly in excess of the RMS rating. The peak OP made it look like a PA amp, until you read the smaller print. Not that I'm down on NAD - they have always come across as one of the few rational players in the market.
|
I met Martin Borish back in Wharfedale days - he was visiting Cambridge Audio, which we were in the process of acquiring from the receiver. I think the undercurrent was he was trying to sell NAD, something he didn't succeed in for another 7 or 8 years.
I had no idea what NAD stood for, so I asked him "dead simple - New Acoustic Dimension".
Craig