UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum

UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum (https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/index.php)
-   Vintage Computers (https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Mk14 vdu (https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/showthread.php?t=162766)

Slothie 13th Nov 2020 12:08 am

Re: Mk14 vdu
 
Here it is https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/...d.php?t=168672

SiriusHardware 13th Nov 2020 1:32 am

Re: Mk14 vdu
 
I'm going to rebuild my OrtonView on a small PIC demo PCB and they have pads for one SOIC IC as well as the QFP (flatpack) version of the 16F877, so I'll be able to test drive Mark's 74LS08 suggestion at that point.

It may take a while though, as I have to solder the occasional wire or two in between actual jobs at work.

SiriusHardware 14th Nov 2020 3:46 pm

Re: Mk14 vdu
 
I'm not in a position to rebuild my OrtonView yest so I have been trying a few extra experiments based on this statement by Karen regarding FW692:-

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karen_O
I've got one more trick to try - I've widened the margins for NENIN release during the active display region. This will mean the SC/MP running a bit slower but worth it if it works.

Once again using my tone generator program which generates 888Hz on Flag 0 when no VDU is enabled, I have the following results when OrtonView is enabled.

FW692 / PIC16F877 = 832Hz
FW523 / PIC16F877 = 832Hz

So no actual difference in the slowdown between those two firmware versions. I also ran Charset under the second combination above, still with 200pF capacitors on A8-A11, and I don't get any corruption there either. In real terms the capacitors appear to make more difference than the difference in the firmware.

The above figure (832Hz) struck me as slower than I remembered, so I tried FW523 / PIC16F877A, the combination I originally made the speed comparison with, and interestingly the frequency rises to 851Hz with that combination, suggesting that something, somewhere, takes less time on the 877A than it does on the plain 877. That would explain why the graphics shudder problem proved so intractable, when the timing of everything is so dependent on exact cycle counts. It also suggests that the problem might still be worth fixing on the 877A for a reward of somewhat greater system speed.

SiriusHardware 14th Nov 2020 4:01 pm

Re: Mk14 vdu
 
Update: Forget what I said above, I've just double re-checked and with FW523 / PIC16F877 I'm getting 851Hz, the figure which the 'Optimised' version of firmware has always given. No idea why I was getting 832Hz that one time.

rherber1 7th May 2021 8:45 am

Re: Mk14 vdu
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Slothie (Post 1255804)
It uses a Thompson SFF96364 CRTC which when I looked at it last year seemed unobtainable, but now I see Littlediode advertising on eBay.

I went through my stock of IC's today and I discovered I have a quantity of 4 x SFF96364 NOS (never used) if anybody is interested.

Little Diode is selling these for £16.79 (AUD30) but I will sell them for AUD15 each plus postage.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 7:29 pm.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2023, Paul Stenning.