|
Components and Circuits For discussions about component types, alternatives and availability, circuit configurations and modifications etc. Discussions here should be of a general nature and not about specific sets. |
|
Thread Tools |
6th Dec 2016, 3:07 pm | #1 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,820
|
Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to restore a rather unloved Roberts P5A from 1948, like this one: http://www.radiomuseum.org/r/roberts_unknown.html It's a mains-only portable with an isolating transfomer supplying the five International Octal valves' heaters but with HT derived directly from the mains, making it one of that rare breed: an AC-only, live-chassis set (complete with non-isolated gram input!). Apart from cosmetic problems, the main trouble seems to be that the KT61 audio output tetrode has lost its vacuum, and I'm not prepared to spend the best part of £100 (or anything like that TBH) on a replacement: http://www.r-type.org/exhib/aad0232.htm Forgive my naivety, but is it possible to use a pentode here instead? If so, could I press into service something as easily obtainable as an EL84 as an interim replacement? http://www.r-type.org/exhib/aaa0028.htm Obviously, I don't want to spoil the set by changing bases, but would be happy to make-up an adaptor using the dead valve's base and make minor wiring changes on the chassis etc. Many thanks, Nick. Last edited by Nickthedentist; 6th Dec 2016 at 3:16 pm. |
6th Dec 2016, 3:36 pm | #2 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,193
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
I've found a used KT61 which I'd need to test. Make me an offer if you like. Proceeds to Ipswich Branch of the RSPCA.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
6th Dec 2016, 3:43 pm | #3 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,820
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Thanks, Graham, that's kind, I will bear that mind.
I'll have to poke around in my box of unsorted pulls too as there might be something more suitable under my nose. N. |
6th Dec 2016, 4:27 pm | #4 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,788
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
A 6V6 should be OK. You just need to check the current and increase the cathode resistor if necessary.
|
6th Dec 2016, 5:20 pm | #5 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,820
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Thanks Paul, I may even have a 6V6GT lying around, and new manufacture "equivalents" with a reasonable reputation are available for sensible prices e.g. https://watfordvalves.com/product_detail.asp?id=1343
Last edited by Nickthedentist; 6th Dec 2016 at 5:26 pm. |
6th Dec 2016, 5:39 pm | #6 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,788
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Most 6.3V octal audio output tetrodes and pentodes have the same pinout and are to some extent interchangeable.
You could certainly also build an adaptor from the old KT61 base. An EL41 or EL84 should be fine subject to the usual caveats, as should many others even including the pentode section of an ECL80. The OP transformer turns ratio may not be ideal and the valve slope may be different, but this doesn't seem to matter much in practice. |
6th Dec 2016, 6:47 pm | #7 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,193
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
I tested the used KT61.
Anode current at specified grid voltage 24mA (spec 40mA). Grid voltage to give 40mA anode current 2.2V (spec 4.4V). gm 9mA/V (spec 10.5mA/V) It'll probably work OK in a set.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
7th Dec 2016, 10:57 am | #8 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,820
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Thanks for all the replies.
Graham, that's very kind of you, but I braved the lock-up last night with my head torch, and found a huge box of valves that a mate gave me while I was at primary school over 30 years ago; he knew I collected old junk and had pulled them out of stuff at a tip while on holiday in the Lake District. Amazingly, the contents of the box was undamaged in spite of 3 house moves and I found several examples of potentially suitable substitutes e.g. 6P25 and 6V6G. If they're faulty, I will get back in touch with you, but realistically, I may be sorted. This is definitely one of those occasions where I'm glad I resisted pressure from everyone around me to "de-clutter" Nick. |
7th Dec 2016, 11:14 am | #9 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Harlaxton, Lincolnshire, UK.
Posts: 3,944
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Hi Nick
I see from your first post snip of the circuit that you must have a service sheet. Does it list the output valve as a KT61? The radiomuseum link you provide lists the output valve as an EL33 (which of course is a pentode). |
7th Dec 2016, 11:56 am | #10 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,193
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Quote:
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
|
7th Dec 2016, 12:24 pm | #11 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,820
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Quote:
You're absolutely right, the Trader Sheet (826) does indeed list it as an EL33, and it's quite rightly described as a "pentode output valve" in the circuit description. Presumably the dead KT61 has just been shoved into the valveholder, as I can't see any evidence of it having been re-wired. So, I'll have to rummage around in the Big Box again tonight. Apologies to everyone I misled (especially Graham). Would an adaptor using the base of the old valve and an EL84 be an option? N. |
|
7th Dec 2016, 12:42 pm | #12 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,788
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
No rewiring necessary. The EL33, KT61 and 6V6 pinouts are all the same.
An EL84 in an adaptor would be fine, but it seems a bit pointless when you already have a plug in substitute. |
7th Dec 2016, 12:42 pm | #13 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,193
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Some sources list the EL33 and KT61 as being equivalents even though one is a pentode and the other a beam tetrode.
That might explain why a KT61 was fitted?
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
7th Dec 2016, 12:57 pm | #14 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,820
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Thanks chaps.
|
7th Dec 2016, 1:00 pm | #15 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Harlaxton, Lincolnshire, UK.
Posts: 3,944
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Yes quite a few listings describe the EL33 and KT61 as if they were the same thing and no doubt in this application it would be difficult to detect any difference in performance.
The EL33 seems to attract quite high prices too, although perhaps not as silly as the KT61. |
8th Dec 2016, 1:05 am | #16 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Leominster, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 16,528
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Obviously the EL audio multiplier isn't as high as the KT one
Certainly they're less kinky
__________________
....__________ ....|____||__|__\_____ .=.| _---\__|__|_---_|. .........O..Chris....O |
9th Dec 2016, 8:45 am | #17 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,820
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Quote:
Results are good but there is perhaps a little more distortion on the audio than I would have expected. I will have to experiment to see whether it's coming from the radio or AF amp sections, or even the Droitwich transmitter (Radio 4 LW). All waxies have been replaced and the voltage on the output valve's control grid is essentially zero. N. Last edited by Nickthedentist; 9th Dec 2016 at 8:54 am. |
|
9th Dec 2016, 9:36 am | #18 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 13,454
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
I make that over 16 volts -ve grid bias, perhaps too much, if the rectifier/transformer(s) can take it I would reduce the grid bias, try somewhere around 10 volts -ve.
Typical bias voltages for Class A: http://www.r-type.org/pdfs/6v6g.pdf Lawrence. Last edited by ms660; 9th Dec 2016 at 9:51 am. |
9th Dec 2016, 12:07 pm | #19 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,788
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
The 6V6 itself may be a bit tired, assuming it's a pull. You could experiment with any other output valves you have with the same pinout.
|
9th Dec 2016, 4:25 pm | #20 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,820
|
Re: Substitution of a KT61 in a 1948 Roberts P5A with something cheaper?
Thank you both.
Paul, I seem to have loads of other suitable valves in the box which I could try. They're all untested pulls though. Quote:
Assuming the control grid is held at 0v, to reduce the amount of -ve grid bias I presume I'd need to increase the voltage on the cathode by increasing the value of the cathode resistor (R17) still further. This would also reduce the anode current below the 29mA where it stands currently. But if that's the case, why do you say "...if the the rectifier/transformer(s) can take it..."? Nick |
|